Tool

Operating-Point Calculator.

Pressure, orifice diameter, and number of orifices together determine every other hydraulic quantity. The calculator makes this coupling visible and flags when a configuration exceeds the safety-relevant thresholds for hand-held tools.

Preliminary designReading time 6 minUpdated 2026-08-27
Operating-Point Calculator Enter a nozzle configuration and read off the hydraulic quantities and safety-relevant thresholds.
Total flow rate2.7l/min
Jet velocity894m/s
Hydraulic power17.7kW
Connected load, estimated25.3kW
Reaction force per tool40 N
0 N150 N250 N400 N

Below 150 N. Hand-held operation is generally permitted under DGUV Rule 100-500, chapter 2.36.

Pressure-flow product10,800 bar·l/min

From 10,000 bar·l/min, DGUV Rule 100-500, chapter 2.36, comes into scope.

Calculation model: Q = 0.667 · cd · d² · √p · n ·  |  v = √(2p/ρ) ·  |  Phyd = p · Q / 600 ·  |  F = 2 · cd · A · p. Results are preliminary planning values. The equipment and tool manufacturer's specifications and the machine-specific risk assessment remain authoritative.

The underlying calculation model

All four output quantities follow from the steady-state analysis of a single orifice. These are the same relationships used during the quotation stage, not a computational-fluid-dynamics simulation.

Flow rate
Q = 0.667 · cd · d² · √p · n
Q
flow rate in l/min
cd
discharge coefficient
d
orifice diameter in mm
p
operating pressure in bar
n
number of orifices operated simultaneously

The squared influence of diameter is the dominant factor. Increasing the diameter from 0.30 mm to 0.40 mm raises demand by roughly 78%.

Reaction force
F = 2 · cd · A · p
F
reaction force in N
A
orifice cross-section in mm²
p
operating pressure in bar

Force rises linearly with pressure and with the square of the diameter. For multi-orifice tools, the vector sum governs. For symmetrically arranged rotary heads, the axial component is well below the sum of the individual forces.

How to read the results

What each output quantity is used for in project work
QuantityUsed ForTypical Follow-on Decision
Flow ratePump selection, water balance, treatment plant sizingSet the pump's rated flow with margin
Jet velocityPlausibility check of the process windowClassify as pure-water or abrasive process
Hydraulic powerComparing competing quotes on the same basisAssess whether rated data are mutually consistent
Connected loadElectrical design, switchgear, coolingSize the grid connection and recooling
Reaction forcePermissibility of hand-held operationDecide between hand-held, fixture, or automation
Pressure-flow productScope of DGUV Rule 100-500, chapter 2.36Set operational briefing and inspection duties
Safety-relevant thresholds

The 150 N and 250 N marks in the calculator reflect section 3.7.5 of DGUV Rule 100-500, chapter 2.36: the reaction force to be absorbed must not exceed 250 N in the long axis, and above 150 N additional measures on the jetting lance are required. The calculator does not replace a risk assessment or the manufacturer's specification for the permitted orifice configuration.

Limits of the model

  • Steady-state analysisStart-up, shutdown, pressure transients, and pulsation are not represented
  • No abrasive effectAbrasive mass flow, focusing-tube geometry, and mixing chamber are not accounted for
  • Treated as incompressibleAt ultra-high pressure, water is measurably compressible; the real velocity is below the calculated value
  • Line losses ignoredPressure losses in pipes, swivels, and hoses reduce the pressure actually available at the tool
  • Efficiency as a flat figureThe real system efficiency depends on load and on the specific product line

Frequently asked questions about the calculator

Which discharge coefficient should I use?

For preliminary planning, 0.70. For a more reliable figure, measure it on the actual tool: record flow rate at a known pressure and diameter, then back-calculate cd. A value that deviates significantly is itself a diagnosis — an unusually high value often points to a worn, oversized bore.

Why is the estimated connected load so much higher than the hydraulic power?

Because several conversion steps sit between the motor shaft and the orifice: the drive, possibly an oil-hydraulic stage, pressure generation, and line losses. For intensifier systems, a factor of roughly 1.4 to 1.5 is realistic; for direct-drive systems, roughly 1.15 to 1.25.

Does the reaction-force figure also apply to rotary tools?

Only to a limited extent. The calculator sums the individual forces over the number of orifices. For symmetrically arranged orifices on a rotary head, the radial components largely cancel, so the axial force to be absorbed is lower. The manufacturer's specification for the specific tool governs in these cases.

Sources and Standards
  1. DGUV Rule 100-500, chapter 2.36 “Working with Liquid Jetting Equipment,” issue March 2017 – https://publikationen.dguv.de/media/pdf/27/3a/6a/R500_236.pdf
  2. DIN EN 1829-1:2021-04, High-pressure water jet machines – Safety requirements – Part 1: Machines – https://www.dinmedia.de/de/norm/din-en-1829-1/321847498